
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: around the net: volume 11, inspirational photographs and film vs. digital</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.prophotolife.com/2008/06/27/around-the-net-volume-11-inspirational-photographs-and-film-vs-digital/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.prophotolife.com/2008/06/27/around-the-net-volume-11-inspirational-photographs-and-film-vs-digital/</link>
	<description>professional photo techniques for all photographers</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Brainard</title>
		<link>http://www.prophotolife.com/2008/06/27/around-the-net-volume-11-inspirational-photographs-and-film-vs-digital/comment-page-1/#comment-735</link>
		<dc:creator>John Brainard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prophotolife.com/?p=152#comment-735</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the pointer to Unsharp Masked. I don't use Photoshop, but I find that some of the tips people write up are translatable to The Gimp. I've learned quite a bit reading Photoshop tutorials.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the pointer to Unsharp Masked. I don&#8217;t use Photoshop, but I find that some of the tips people write up are translatable to The Gimp. I&#8217;ve learned quite a bit reading Photoshop tutorials.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Phillips</title>
		<link>http://www.prophotolife.com/2008/06/27/around-the-net-volume-11-inspirational-photographs-and-film-vs-digital/comment-page-1/#comment-718</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Phillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 04:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prophotolife.com/?p=152#comment-718</guid>
		<description>Shooting slower will force you to give more effort to each photo and they will therefore be better in the end.  It is a difference in mindset.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shooting slower will force you to give more effort to each photo and they will therefore be better in the end.  It is a difference in mindset.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.prophotolife.com/2008/06/27/around-the-net-volume-11-inspirational-photographs-and-film-vs-digital/comment-page-1/#comment-714</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 19:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prophotolife.com/?p=152#comment-714</guid>
		<description>I've been dabbling in film myself. I just started out in photography 2 years ago when I got a DSLR. I did have a Pentax K1000 and two lenses, and decided to give B&#38;W film a try. 

I love the results. For me, it's really different than digital. With digital, I'm much more apt to shoot lots of pictures, moving slightly here, there, zooming in, zooming out, etc. With film, I'm extremely aware that each trip of the shutter costs me money in the immediate future. 

Also, the K1000 is a fully manual camera, save an exposure meter (center weighted, I believe). While I shoot almost exclusively in manual on my DSLR, everything just seems slower on the Pentax. It's a nice, relaxing way for me to shoot. 

I still don't have a great solution for the scans, processing, etc. Only time will tell how far I'll go with this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been dabbling in film myself. I just started out in photography 2 years ago when I got a DSLR. I did have a Pentax K1000 and two lenses, and decided to give B&amp;W film a try. </p>
<p>I love the results. For me, it&#8217;s really different than digital. With digital, I&#8217;m much more apt to shoot lots of pictures, moving slightly here, there, zooming in, zooming out, etc. With film, I&#8217;m extremely aware that each trip of the shutter costs me money in the immediate future. </p>
<p>Also, the K1000 is a fully manual camera, save an exposure meter (center weighted, I believe). While I shoot almost exclusively in manual on my DSLR, everything just seems slower on the Pentax. It&#8217;s a nice, relaxing way for me to shoot. </p>
<p>I still don&#8217;t have a great solution for the scans, processing, etc. Only time will tell how far I&#8217;ll go with this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.prophotolife.com/2008/06/27/around-the-net-volume-11-inspirational-photographs-and-film-vs-digital/comment-page-1/#comment-712</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prophotolife.com/?p=152#comment-712</guid>
		<description>I added the unsharpedmask site to my favorites.  Some good Photoshop tips there.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I added the unsharpedmask site to my favorites.  Some good Photoshop tips there.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
